Angel

Exploring the merits and demerits of composition techniques, I have written here and elsewhere about recycling, quoting and sampling music. I have pondered the commonplace practises of borrowing themes, phrases and styles, and the inevitability of inspiration leading to imitation. Since this blog is also intended as a demonstration, I thought it would be sensible to take something of my own where this has occurred and examine it on that basis.

For a couple of years, I enjoyed a great gig in Mondello, Sicily, which is a holiday resort of that beautiful mediterranean island which the Italians enjoy. The booking was 3 weeks to a month long, usually in one or two clubs, in February, out of season, so the venues were full of locals rather than tourists who would have expected a set full of covers. We were booked on the basis of our dynamic live show and all original songs.


My band at the time consisted of myself on lead vocals, keyboards, guitar and anything else I could lay my hands on, my writing partner and friend Kevin Goldsborough on bass and guitar, a 16 year old Ross Godfrey, who went on to star in Morcheeba, on guitar, his dodgy friend Nick on sax and percussion, and Sophy Griffiths on vocals and acrobatics. A drummer would have eaten up our funds, so we replaced live drums with loops, which I created myself from rehearsals, and programmed beats. I used the playback element to enhance the arrangements, which gave us a bigger sound, and kind of made up for the lack of kit. It was a modern sound for the time, and mostly the gigs were a riot.

She was the greatest thing that ever happened to him,
Tender as a girl can get
It would ease your mind to know, but you won’t ever
If she told you now to go, you would forgive her…

“Angel” is a song I wrote to fill a gap in my band’s live set, designed to get the crowd moving. The laid-back Sicilians were there to watch, listen and socialise, but we could generally coax them onto their feet. This song, which describes the siren call of sexual promise, quotes one of the most inspiring pop / rock musicians to have emerged in the latter half of the twentieth century, David Bowie.

Aside from giving me the ability to co-write with one of my musical heroes, the song is a collaboration with Kevin Goldsborough, who supplied the wonderful melodic bassline, which moves from dark and brooding in the verse to cheerful and uplifting in the chorus. We wrote hundreds of songs together, until it became second nature. Kevin’s musical clarity and expression remains a sublime part of my life. Funnily enough, he comes from exactly the same part of London as Bowie, and when he sings, listeners often pick up on the similarity. It’s the south London vowels.

With “Angel” I wanted to introduce layers of meaning, making the song accessible to the listener without knowledge of the other song, whilst adding another dimension to anyone who did have knowledge, which illustrated its meaning on a meta-level. I don’t think it matters that few people would get this – it is in the song for seekers to find – so long as it works on the simple level of tune, narrative, groove. Falling under a musical spell is an analog to falling under a sexual spell, commanding the soul and demanding that the body moves.

I quote Bowie’s song both indirectly by referring to it lyrically, by interpreting it in the arrangement, and also directly by incorporating it into the chorus. I’m not going to tell you which song I quote – if you know, then leave a comment, and I will fess up. This is a demo with a live vocal, recorded on a four track tape machine, so it’s a little bit rough around the edges sonically, but that is forgivable. It is a decent representation of how the band sounded live, and I think the recording is good for all that.

Post to Twitter Tweet this Post to Facebook Share on Facebook

Sexy Underwear

I wrote “Sexy Underwear” with Dan Brittain during the Rise and Shine show pilot series, with a lot of input from the French-speaking members of the community which grew up around Seesmic. France has a jealously-guarded, distinctive cultural music tradition which sets it apart, but while French chansons rarely make it in the UK charts, at 11% France represents the third largest audience for UK music after the US and Germany. So it’s not only a great thing to be able to make music for a French-speaking audience but it makes sound commercial sense.

After the song was written, to my great delight, Otir and Virginie both provided French versions of the lyric, which is about Parisian landlords exploiting poor students for sex. Virginie worked hard on making the lyric flow and sang a guide. The original contains French but is 90% English, and sang in male voice, and since the song is about exploitation of women, it’s appropriate to switch gender.

Today Jule, an American female singer is going to sing the French version. I’m fascinated to hear the results.

<a href="http://songs.riseandshine.tv/track/sexy-underwear">Sexy Underwear by The Daily Song</a>

Post script: Session went really well, and we’ve got a great female French language version recorded. I also shot some video of Jule explaining her personal connection to the issues in the song which I’ll post soon.

Post to Twitter Tweet this Post to Facebook Share on Facebook

Raiding the Writer

A few times in my career it’s been made clear to me that should X star/band choose to record my song, he/she/they will of course be credited as co-writers despite the fact they lifted not a pen nor approached a keyboard nor strummed a ukelele in the composition of this potential hit.

This claim on publishing has become relatively commonplace. Whatever the merits of the work, the craft employed, or the song’s sweet completeness, stars (via their lawyers and managers) make a smash-and-grab raid on all earnings, including publishing, so that they will continue to benefit as long as the song is generating revenue.

This kind of thing has been going on since publishing began – the Berne Convention
for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works
dates back to 1886. Writers when they start out are usually desperate for any kind of success and largely ignorant of their rights, and this makes them easy targets.

I can understand the “get it while you can” mentality in the den of iniquity that is the music business. It’s as if artists are still haunted by the bad old days of tiny payments as the music industry grows fat by deducting endless amounts for spurious reasons, winnowing away at their hard-earned income. Believe it or not, CD royalties are still subject to “new technology” deduction brought in in the 1980s, and on what basis can downloads be subject to deductions for “breakages”?

Nonetheless, this particular form of artistic cannibalism fills me, as a writer, with genuine ire. From the elevated position of the star, their attitude is simple. We are your gateway to wealth, therefore we can insert our claim on the publishing revenue and if you don’t like it, we’ll use someone else’s song.

Now, I’m not naive enough to think that the world is going to be different from the way it is any time soon. But, the worst thing about this practise is that it is not being questioned or resisted, and the bigger the star, the more aggressive the lawyers, and the more certain that writers will be squeezed out of their fair share. If you’re an established writer nobody will attempt to extract part of the royalty due to you for your work, but if you’re less well known, then it’s almost guaranteed that the attempt will me made to deny you some percentage of your future earnings from your hard-won intellectual property.

I can make the distinction between an artist who picks up a song and develops it or alters it substantially enough to bring it to commercial success, by adding lyrics, or by including new melodies, for example. But, the job of making a song into a commercial recording is called Production, or Remixing, and these important activities have their own slices of the pie. Hands off mine!

It’s not enough to take a song, add beats and noises which suit your style, super-impose a rap and a three note riff, and then say,

Hey, I re-wrote it! I want 50%…

Have I ever given part of my publishing to an artist who had nothing to do with writing the song? Yes, but it was small enough not to be painful. Did I regret it? No. Did I think it was wrong? Yes. Would I do it again? It depends – not if I can avoid it!

In the end, it comes down to choice. Diminished revenue is one issue. Would you rather have 100% of a song which doesn’t sell, or a lesser amount of a big hit? But, there is also the important issue of authorship. If you give some part of your song publishing to the artist, then they are forever associated with the creation of the song. Is that going to help or harm your career? It’s a tough call, especially when the rewards are temptingly large.

Photo from here.

Post to Twitter Tweet this Post to Facebook Share on Facebook

Drunk Bowie Sings Heroes

Surely I shouldn’t be watching this right now, since David Bowie is a PRS registered UK artist and YouTube and PRS are in dispute and all the music is blocked. Not this though, thanks to @lagowski for the steer. Mind you, Bowie has advocated and pioneered the use of music on the internet, and like Prince, and a select band of enlightened “old style” artists has seen the value of digital music sharing: an essential route to new fans, along with radio, tv and playing live. If they have never heard you, they can’t like you. For artists with something to say, it’s also a direct channel to the people they love the most – their fans. Do not underestimate the power of disintermediated uncensored mass communication.

This is a pretty rousing live version of the classic Bowie song, his rock anthem par excellence, but you can hear the march of a thousand gigs in the performance. Bowie uses his mature voice in a unique way though, what energy. I’m a big fan of Bowie’s “trilogy” songwriting period: Low, Heroes, and Lodger.

The first single I ever bought (aged ten) was Space Oddity.

/end fandom.

Post to Twitter Tweet this Post to Facebook Share on Facebook